This commercial being run by former Rapides Parish Sheriff and current candidate for Sheriff ran across my TV tonight:
I am confused. Mr. Hilton implies that Chuck should have arrested him for these alleged crimes but claims that Chuck hasn’t done so because there is no evidence [of Mr. Hilton taking any guns] (I don’t know much about the other allegation). Ok…what is this then Mr. Hilton:
Mr. Hilton, we all know you did not kill Jimmy Hoffa. I suppose that was an effort to be sarcastic and dismissive of the various claims made against you. Please leave the joking to us bloggers and please explain why the above document is being tossed around the internet as evidence you did in fact do something wrong relating to the “missing gun” allegation.
We all await your explanation. I assure you that if you have a plausible explanation that I will post it and defend you (well, I will post whatever explanation you have).
It is not that big of a deal to me if you did take a gun that was ordered destroyed. What is bothering me is that you won’t give a straight answer. You sounded more like a criminal lawyer on your commercial than a law enforcement officer.